Paaras Chand
Professor Knapp
English 1B
27 May 2011
On a Field, Sable, the Letter A Gules
Nathaniel Hawthorne’s writing incorporates a style many of his contemporaries tried to replicate in a time based upon Puritan values, changing ideals, and deeper meanings within natural life. The Scarlet Letter is an adventure valued as much as the Nineteenth century itself -- it became the first step into true American literature; the breaking point of Puritan philosophies and ways of life; and the beginning of the Transcendental, Gothic, Anti-Transcendental, and Romantic time periods (Whipple 355).
The Scarlet Letter follows the struggles and triumph of Hester Prynne, a young woman who has a child out of wedlock. She is forced to wear a red letter A (for adulterer) on her clothing at all times while raising her young daughter, Pearl. Ultimately she learns how to overcome her adversity and redeem herself from her sin, but she isn’t the only one. Arthur Dimmesdale, Chillingworth, and even Pearl have their own “sub-journeys” into redemption. Anne W. Abbott’s critique applauds Hawthorne’s “artistic prowess” and Pearl’s character, but questions the reality of Roger Chillingworth, Hester, and Arthur Dimmesdale. E.P Whipple criticizes Hawthorne for creating a plot “too painfully anatomical” but applauds his “purely objective” outlook on romance and sin.
In a time ruled by Puritan ideals and the Church, one small “sin” could lead to devastating consequences. An affair was greatly looked down upon during the Sixteenth century and any news of such an event would kill the reputation of both parties. Arthur Dimmesdale, the father of Pearl and respected minister of Salem, buried his sin within himself (literally) to protect his position, but in the end discovered his sin was the key to the future. Abbott feels that Dimmesdale is “better kept” than the other characters in the story, but still far from realistic (Abbott 372). She mocks how Dimmesdale “exhales at the first gleam of hope” and does not deal with the further consequences of his sin; he goes straight to death (Abbott 375). Dimmesdale definitely had several opportunities to admit his sin, but to say he did absolutely nothing in an overstatement. Dimmesdale came to the rescue when the Governor and townspeople were considering removing Pearl from her mother. He reasoned that “God gave her the child, and gave her, too, an instinctive knowledge of its nature and requirements--both seemingly so peculiar--which no other mortal being can possess” (Hawthorne 91). Dimmesdale also hid messages about his sin in his sermons by saying “No man, for any considerable period, can wear one face to himself and another to the multitude, without finally getting bewildered as to which may be the true . . . Be true! Be true! Be true! Show freely to the world, if not your worst, yet some trait whereby the worst may be inferred!” (Hawthorne 93 & 103). It can even be argued that Dimmesdale shared Hester's pain every time “the young minister... [Held] his hand over his heart, as was his custom whenever his peculiarly nervous temperament was thrown into agitation” (Hawthorne 90). Nevertheless Dimmesdale’s full redemption did not occur until he had committed suicide. If Hawthorne had not killed Dimmesdale through suicide, it would have brought more questions of validity to the reader’s mind; the story would sound too much like a “happily ever after” (Abbott 370).
Chillingworth is an odd character. Hawthorne painted almost every character with two sides; as a sinner and as a great man or woman. But Chillingworth only seems to fit into one of these categories; as a sinner, even a purely evil man. Abbott even goes as far as to say that “Chillingworth ... seems to have so little in common with map, he is such a gnome-like phantasm, such an unnatural personification of an abstract idea, that we should be puzzled to assign him a place among angels, men, or devils” (Abbott 372). Hawthorne introduces Chillingworth as a mysterious character who “found the eyes of Hester Prynne fastened on his own, and saw that she appeared to recognize him, he slowly and calmly raised his finger, made a gesture with it in the air, and laid it on his lips” (Hawthorne 36). The audience is left to wonder what Chillingworth will do now that he knows his wife has been untrue to him. Chillingworth dies with as much reality as he was born. He seems to only have served as the antagonist of the story; a man to carry out the devils work. And if he is truly Hawthorne's symbol for the devil, then his death marks the beginning of a new day. Hawthorne ends his tale by saying that “when there was no more Devil's work on earth for [Chillingworth] to do, it only remained for the unhumanised mortal to betake himself whither his master would find him tasks enough, and pay him his wages duly” (Hawthorne 120). It seems that Chillingworth’s redemption was also answered with death, but it's debatable whether or not he actually redeemed himself. Even Dimmesdale adds insult to injury by saying “[Chillingworth has committed a crime] far worse than death!” (Hawthorne 87). But if there is any redemption for Chillingworth, it's that in the end he finally learned to accept Pearl. He left his riches for her and she coincidentally ended up going back to Europe, Chillingworth’s home land.
Hester Prynne -- marked with sin and challenge -- journeyed through The Scarlet Letter through humility, hurt, and happiness. After her trial, Hester wanted to start a new life, focusing on the future of Pearl. Abbott says that “Hester at first strongly excites our pity, for she suffers like an immortal being,” but as she works more toward redemption “her humility catches a new tint, and we find it pride” (Abbott 371). Hester Prynne's adversity forced her to grow as a person. Even though the people around her may have sinned more than she did; she still had to live with a physical mark which reminded every passerby of what she had done. In the beginning Hester even tries to hide her mark; “the mother of this child stood fully revealed before the crowd, it seemed to be her first impulse to clasp the infant closely to her bosom; not so much by an impulse of motherly affection, as that she might thereby conceal a certain token” (Hawthorne 16). But Hester didn't succumb to the opinions of the public. She stayed strong and created a new image for herself. An image so strong that it made people forget the original meaning of the A and add their own; “The letter was the symbol of her calling...They said that it meant 'Able'; so strong was Hester Prynne, with a woman's strength” (Hawthorne 159). Hester's redemption is much more “usual” than the other character's. She learns to forgive Arthur and love Pearl with all her heart.
No Pearl can be worth more to a story than Hester’s Pearl, but no pearl had ever been as expensive as this one either. Pearl was born into a Puritan prison in more ways than one and remains a symbol throughout the story. Abbott goes on to say that Pearl is the “gem of the purest water . . . a perfect truth to childish and human nature.” Pearl is one of a kind; she's not like the other children. From the beginning Pearl's always had a strange personality. She is an intelligent girl who respects her mother and her situation, but has also been the reason many of her mother’s most stressful problems. Throughout the story she absorbs the hidden emotions of her mother and magnifies them for all to see. Pearl, physically, is a reminder of Hester's sin, but she also “at times a vehicle for Hawthorne to express the inconsistent and translucent qualities of Hester’s unlawful bond” (Whipple 367). When meeting with the governor Hester expressed how much Pearl had changed her life by saying “[Pearl] is my happiness--she is my torture, none the less! Pearl keeps me here in life! Pearl punishes me, too!” (Hawthorne 90). But just because Pearl is a child doesn't mean she doesn't notice the way the townspeople view her mother. She repeatedly asks her mother why she must wear the scarlet letter A. At one time she even made her own out of sea weed and asked “But in good earnest, now, mother dear, what does this scarlet letter mean? — and why dost thou wear it on thy bosom?” (Hawthone 100). When Hester removed her scarlet letter A in hopes of escaping with Dimmesdale, Pearl forced her to put it on. And even Hester says “But, in very truth, she is right as regards this hateful token. I must bear its torture yet a little longer” (Hawthorne 111). Pearl was the reason for Hester's redemption. If it had been up to Hester, she would have run away from her problems, but with Pearl's help she not only managed to change her image, but also push Dimmesdale into admitting his sin -- redemption for all.
The characters within The Scarlet Letter are not the ones from the perfect happy endings, but they attempt to represent more realistic characters. Hawthorne came from a world where he realized that not everything was as pure as he had believed, including himself. He makes an attempt to challenge the reader’s perception of society and how we view characters. Adultry is still looked down upon even in today’s society. Were we to be alive during the Sixteenth century would we react in the same way as the Puritans? Nathaniel Hawthorne does, however, make an attempt to redeem every character. Though some character redemptions are debatable, they do achieve a higher good. Roger Chillingworth may die, but he comes to accept Pearl as a daughter. Pearl may not have committed any sin directly, but she, too, had to tackle prejudice and live the same life as her mother. In the end Pearl decided to leave the Puritan society. But the legend of her mother’s journey stays strong “On A Field, Sable, The Letter A Gules” (Hawthorne 150).
Works Cited
Abbott, Anne W. "Review of 'The Scarlet Letter, a Romance." 1850. The Scarlet Letter & Other Writings. New York: W.W. Norton, 2005. 371-82. Print.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel, and Leland S. Person. The Scarlet Letter and Other Writings: Authoritative Texts, Contexts, Criticism. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2005. Print.
Whipple, E. P. "Review of 'The Scarlet Letter, a Romance." 1850. The Scarlet Letter & Other Writings. New York: W.W. Norton, 2005. 352-67. Print.